Section 9 of the IBC: the operational creditor's route when an Indian company will not pay

Who is an operational creditor under the IBC

Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, an operational creditor is a person owed an operational debt — money for goods or services supplied, including to a company as its supplier, contractor or service provider. A trade creditor with unpaid invoices is the classic case. Financial creditors — lenders — take a different route under Section 7; this guide is about suppliers.

What Section 9 of the IBC does

Section 9 lets an operational creditor apply to the National Company Law Tribunal to initiate the corporate insolvency resolution process against a company that has defaulted on its debt. If the petition is admitted, a moratorium begins, a resolution professional takes charge, and the board's powers are suspended. The company's fate is then decided by a committee of its creditors.

That is why the instrument works as weight. A company that is functional, solvent and merely choosing not to pay a supplier faces a consequence that dwarfs the debt: losing control of the business. Most such companies settle in the window between the demand notice and the hearing. The petition's power is that it is credible; the outcome most creditors want is settlement, not insolvency.

The sequence

1. Section 8 demand notice. The creditor serves a demand notice in the prescribed form, with a copy of the invoice, on the corporate debtor. This is a statutory step, not an ordinary legal notice; the form and the mode of service matter.
2. The debtor's window. The debtor has a short statutory period to either pay or bring to the creditor's notice the existence of a dispute, or of a suit or arbitration already pending, relating to the debt.
3. Petition. If neither happens, the creditor files under Section 9 at the NCLT bench for the state where the debtor company is registered, with the notice, proof of service, invoices, and an affidavit that no notice of dispute was received.
4. Admission or rejection. The tribunal admits the petition if the debt is due, unpaid, above the threshold and not the subject of a pre-existing genuine dispute — or rejects it.

The threshold

The minimum default for initiating the process was raised in 2020 to one crore rupees. Claims below that cannot use Section 9 and take the civil route — a summary or commercial suit — instead. Check the current figure before relying on it.

The dispute defence

The Code protects companies from being pushed into insolvency over contested bills. If the debtor can show a genuine, pre-existing dispute about the goods, the services or the amount — raised before the demand notice, not invented in response to it — the petition fails. This is the single most important reason to keep dispute correspondence clean throughout the relationship: a supplier who resolved disputes in writing as they arose is in a very different position from one whose customer can produce a year-old complaint email.

When we advise against it

Section 9 is the wrong route when the claim is below the threshold; when there is a real dispute on the facts; when the debtor company has already ceased operating and has no assets, so that admission produces a process and no money; or when the sum is modest relative to the cost of a contested petition. It is also not a route to be threatened without intent — a Section 8 notice that is never followed by a petition shows the debtor that the creditor does not mean it. Kenstone Capital assesses each case before recommending the route, and every step beyond the notice goes on the client's written approval. How that works is on Enforce.

For foreign suppliers

A supplier outside India owed by an Indian company is an operational creditor on the same footing as a domestic one. Section 9 is, in practice, the most effective lever a foreign supplier has against a functional Indian debtor — provided the claim is documented and the notice is served correctly. See Debt collection in India for international suppliers.

Sources and regulation

Thresholds, limitation periods and procedures change. This guide describes the position as generally understood at the time of writing and is not legal advice; confirm the current rule before acting.